Friday, January 27, 2006

Back to WinAmp

As you most likely know, all the original developers from NullSoft that worked on WinAmp prior to the AOL assimilation left the company a while back. Combine that with the anoyingly slow "modern" skin and a few other anoying features and I finally decided I needed to move on to a different audio player.

Well, I made the rounds, and short of writing my own player I think I am going to stick with WinAmp for now. Sure, it still has some warts, but for overall usibility for playing audio it is the best, and it is well supported. The fact it also does video playback is good too.

I'll stick with the free version for now. My audio ripping needs are satisfied by AudioGrabber (via LAME), Monkey Audio and FLAC.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] []

Happy Birthday Mozart

Break out the powdered wigs and put on your classical music. Today is Mozart's 250th birthday. How are you celebrating?

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

The Future of Serenity

Despite very good reviews, and staying well within budget, Serenity didn't do so hot in the box office it turns out. All is not lost. Amazon still ranks Serenity as #3 in DVD sales, with Firefly close behind in #5.

As Joss put it:

DVD sales should, however, put Serenity back in the black and when the bucks start rolling in we can only hope that one of the suits at Universal looks at the numbers, adds the success of the Firefly DVD box set and greenlights a return for Captain Reynolds and his crew.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

Google Maps Package Mapper

Honestly I think it would be a good idea for Google to provide this as part of their services. Until they do, we can use PackageMapper.com from Oliver Steele. Just enter your tracking number, and it uses SimpleTracking.com's RSS feed for that tracking number to get the history of where the package has been. Then he uses the Google Maps API to display it all on a Google Map.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Friday, January 13, 2006

Moving to WordPress 2.0

I really like WordPress, and the new 2.0 release is sweet. I've been slowly moving some of my smaller blogs over to Wordpress 1.5, and I just this week upgraded one of them to Wordpress 2.0. The installs are always so easy (provided the host doesn't get goofy on me), it is well documented, well supported, and it is such a nicer interface then Blogger offers. I am planning to upgrade this blog soon too. So if you notice some changes or if you cannot access the blog that is why.

If you want to use WordPress, and don't want to mess with installing it on your server then check out www.WordPress.com.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Self referential

This is a word that describes itself:

sesquipedalian: (of words) long; having many syllables.

Unlike abreviated.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Serenity Quote

The movie Serenity is full of great quotes. Joss Wheaton is just a great writer. Listening to the DVD commentary he said that he had a lot of long sections of dialog that were actually cut out. I guess he is really into conversation.

This quote is one of my favorites, and it is in the first 9 minutes of the movie, even before the credits run. The scene it is from forshadows one of the last few scenes in the movie beautifully and it establishes the new character of the Operative very nicely.

  • The Operative: You know, in certain 'older' civilized cultures, when men failed as entirely as you have, they would throw themselves on their swords.
  • Dr. Mathias: Well, unfortunately, I forgot to bring a sword.
  • Dr. Mathias: [as the Operative pulls out his sword] I would put that down right now if I were you.
  • The Operative: Would you be killed in your sleep, like an ailing pet?
  • Fight ensues. Dr. Mathias attempts escape. The Operative paralyzes him and then places the sword so he can fall on it. After he falls on the sword, before he dies.
  • The Operative: This is a good death. There's no shame in this. In a man's death, a man who has done fine works.

You can watch the first 9 minutes online even.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Playing with Pandora

If you haven't been out to Pandora I highly suggest you check it out now. It basically lets you build your own radio stations. They created a huge music taxonomy, classifying music by many different criteria. Then you tell it which songs you like and which you don't and it finds more that you will like. I found it very accurate.

One tip, if you create a station based on an artist then it will play music like everything the artist has made. So if they released some crossover song then you might be surprised by what they play. So if you want to really fine tune it create a station based on a specific song.

Out of curiosity I created a new station based on a specific song, then never told it anything else I liked. Eventually it played the song the station was based on. I told it I didn't like that song. Logically since the criteria the station was created on is now negated then it would be forced to play music without any criteria. I expected something like Brittiny Spears to start playing. No such luck, it just kept playing similer music. Interesting.

You will also notice that if you keep skipping songs, or voting them as not liked then afte the 10th skip it won't let you skip any more. You can still say you don't like it, but it still finishes the track. This is a result of the music license they have. Unfortunately. Although if you voted 10 tracks down chances are you are on the wrong station.

I also get a kick out of reading the "Why did you play this song?" descriptions. They use words like rhythmic syncopation, vocal-centric aesthetic and other musical terms I am unsure of the meaning of. It would be nice if they had a hyperlink to a vocabulary and maybe a sample of what that sounds like exactly.

They give you the ability to email a station to someone. Unfortunately that means if you want to post a cool station to your blog that you have to email it to yourself first. Check out this interesting station I actually discovered by accident.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] [] []

Justice is (Color) Blind

I actually wrote this post a long time ago. Back in November of 2004, but somehow it never got posted. My good friend Rich Hundhausen posted about his jury duty which reminded me of this, and then when I looked for it I couldn't find it. So here it is, and just a little late.

Justice is (Color) Blind

Well at least the jury and bailiffs are.

As I previously mentioned I was on jury duty during November 2004. My number did come up one day and I had to go down to the court house as a perspective juror.

There were three juries that morning. I was perspective juror 241. They gave me a pink badge that said "Jury" on it and I took a seat. I looked around and noticed there were also blue badges and another shade of pink. I thought maybe some of the badges were faded, since it was a very similar color. I was curious where the third jury was, since just pink and blue where here.

And why blue and pink? Those are the colors they put new babies in so you know if they are a boy or girl.

We all set quietly with very little talking. Just an occasional whisper. Something about being in a court house seems to make most people nervous.

A bailiff came in and announced that the salmon jury should follow him. Salmon? I noticed that people with both shades of pink were getting up to follow him. Then he reiterated that pink and blue should stay, but salmon should follow him.

I looked over at a guy next to me with the same colored badge. He looked as confused as I felt. "Are we salmon?" I asked.

"I have no idea," was his response.

So I turned to another bailiff and asked him. He glanced at my badge, tipped it in the light, then looked over at someone with the other shade of pink and examined their badge. He finally nodded his head so I headed out.

We were led to another room full of jurors. They had badges that were my shade as well as the other shade. So the color issue was still not solved.

Another bailiff introduced her self and said we would be with her in this court room. A video was started and the bailiff went to turn down the lights. He flipped a number of switches on and off as he watched the lights go on and off. It was like he had not' adjusted the lights in here before. He finally settled for all the lights being off.

We watched a video that explained how important jury duty was. It also explained some of the process. Basically we would be randomly selected and then questioned. We could then be possibly dismissed if either side thought we were somehow biased or connected with the case. They stressed that being dismissed should not be taken personally.

Before the video was over the lights came on and again a bailiff said for all the salmon ones to follow him. This was a little confusing, but I figured they changed their mind so I started to get up. I was starting to wonder if we were being tested on our ability to follow orders and also differentiate colors.

Before we got far the other bailiff protested and said pink was to follow her. There was a short debate as they examined badge colors and paper work. They finally came to an agreement.

Of course at this point no one knew what color they were. They held up a badge of one color and said "This color follow me," then they held up the other shade of pink, "This color stay."

I still don't know what color I was, but I ended up with everyone having the same shade of pink that I did.

I ended up not having my number called up for questioning as a juror, so it is conceivable I was in the wrong court room.

Afterwards we all commented to each other about how crazy their color selection was. Just imagine if someone actually was color blind!

(For those of you who are really paying attention, I used the color salmon instead of pink, since salmon is easier to read on white. Just so you know, the difference between the two badges was MUCH less pronounced.)

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Waterborne on Google Video

I just watched Waterborne on Google Video. It is an independent film that is exclusively premiering on Google Video. The movie follows the aftermath of a fictional biological terrorist attack on the LA water supply. I must say, I am REALLY impressed. It is a great movie, and the Google streaming video feed worked great. They are selling the movie for $3.99 and I highly recommend you go check it out.

I embedded the video bellow so you can watch it here if you like. But you will get a little better control if you visit the Google page.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] [] [] []

Crazy CS 3D Video Games

Stanford's CS 248 - Intro to Computer Graphics - has a final project to create a 3D video game. Check out the winners and finalists for 2005. I personally thought the 1st and 2nd place winners were far wackier games then the game that won wackiest. Although I imagine that game won wackiest because of its creative input: tilting an Apple Power Book.

Thanks to Matt for the link!

Subject tags: [] [] []

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

No such thing as luck

I suggested there was no such thing as luck. My friend Jake said "What about winning the lottery"?

Winning the lottery is not something you can influence directly without cheating, but it isn't luck. There are a number of required steps on your part that you must do to actually win the lottery:

  1. Buy a ticket
  2. Remain in possession of ticket
  3. Be aware it is the winning ticket
  4. Claim the prize

Miss a step and you don't win. In life and business many people skip some or all of the steps and then wonder why they don't win. Of course the business steps are a little different:

  1. Have a product or service
  2. Offer your product or service for sale
  3. Find (marketing, etc.) a customer
  4. Close the sale

The only thing that changes is what are your odds of moving from step 2 to 3. If you want to sell pickled worm yogurt in your business then you will have a hard time finding customers. Might be similar to your odds of winning the lottery. But if you keep offering your product (or buying your ticket) then you increase your odds.

It is all about knowing the cost before you go into a deal. You could for example buy all the possible numeric combinations for the lottery and win, but that wouldn't be a good investment. Likewise you could go door to door, offering a free sample of your yogurt to everyone on the planet, until you find someone who likes it. Again that would be a good propsition.

Now I don't advocate playing the lottery or making pickled worm yogurt. Stick to something with better odds. The secret is to do a little research first. Invest into propositions that have a high chance of a good return. Don't go for the million to 1 longshots. Find a sure thing that you can reproduce over and over again.

Guy Kawasaki's Blog

The Art of the Start

Thanks to Chris Woodruff for the tip that Guy Kawasaki has started a blog. His blog is titled Let the Good Times Roll with Guy Kawasaki with the subject like (which I love) of Blogger. n. Someone with nothing to say writing for someone with nothing to do. Guy is possibly best known for his book The Art of the Start.

Check him out and what he can do for you business.

Subject tags: [] [] []

Friday, January 06, 2006

Fast Electric Car

Wrightspeed Electric Supercar Ride (0-60 in 3 seconds)

I want one.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Camera's and the Law

I've know a number of people to be threatened about their act of taking pictures as being illegal. Turns out taking pictures is a lot more legal then most people realized. Basically, if you are taking a picture of something in public, then it is legal. So you can go to the mall with your camera and take pictures, or take pictures of a building.

Andrew Kantor did some great research on when and what it is legal to photograph, as well as when and what it is legal to publish. Your biggest threat is a civil suit, or being charged with trespassing while taking the picture.

Just remember, neither Andrew nor myself are lawyers, and this is not legal advice.

Subject tags: [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []

The History of Food

Now I really enjoy food. I think most people do. I also find the history of food really interesting. Thanks to this Food Time Line anyone can explore when foods were introduced and the history behind them.

For example, did you know Fried Chicken was introduced in the 1st Century AD? Or that the Marshmallow was originally from a plant? Maybe you are looking for an authentic 1660 recipe for Marzipan?

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Gmail Storage: Take 2 - Part 2

I was curious what causes the Gmail usage statistic to change, and how quickly it updates.

To save you from needing to look at my last post, here were my usage statistics

You are currently using 574 MB (21%) of your 2681 MB.

I sent myself a 10 MB email. Sure enough immediately my usage statistics changed to:

You are currently using 587 MB (22%) of your 2681 MB.

A jump of more then 10 MB from what it just was. 13 MB in fact. My guess is that it is measuring the Base 64 encoded (MIME) size of the binary attachment.

Now I delete it. No change. So I went into the trash and hit delete forever.

You are currently using 574 MB (21%) of your 2681 MB.
Right back to where I started from. So the usage updates immediately, but it also includes your trash and Spam folders.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []

Gmail Storage Space: Take 2

I previously reported that my Gmail usage statistics as of October 24th:

You are currently using 547 MB (21%) of your 2657 MB.

I was watching that percentage for a while and I got a rather large attachment which bumped me to 22%. I decided to stick it out a little longer to see if the average came back down to 21%. It did not. Here are my usage statistics as of December 13th:

You are currently using 577 MB (22%) of your 2673 MB.

Still not bad for almost 50 days of heavy email usage.

For some reason I took a long time to post this. Now it is January 5th. Since December I unsubscribed from a lot of the mailing lists I didn't read anyway, subscribed to a few more, started 3 more Yahoo!Groups & GoogleGroups and made some new friends. I still get a lot of email, and still don't delete very much of it. Here is my new usage statistics:

You are currently using 574 MB (21%) of your 2681 MB.

My total use decreased, so percentage also decreased. Curious where that 3 MB of email went I looked in my trash folder. Despite the warning that "(messages that have been in Trash more than 30 days will be automatically deleted)" I still found all my trash back to August of 2004. Looking in my Spam folder showed that they are in fact deleting spam over 30 days old since it only goes back to December 6th, 2005. When I checked my spam folder before it went back much farther then that. So I am guessing that the missing 3 MB of mail was Spam, so it really isn't missed very much.

Just in case you are curious, over 73 days Gmail gave me an additional 24 MB of storage. That is about a third (1/3 or 0.33) of a megabyte of storage per day. So as long as I get around a third of a megabyte of email per day then I will stay at about 21% usage. If not then I will need to start emptying my trash, and deleting more emails.

Since I know you are all really curious about how many emails I have:

  • 545 Spam (30 days worth)
  • 423 Trash (since August of 2004)
  • 8352 Other messages
    • 2611 Inbox messages
    • 1577 unread inbox messages

That doesn't tell you how many unread messages there are outside my inbox. In all honesty I will probably never read them anyway, unless they show up in my search at some point. Same is most likely true for most of the 1577 unread messages in my inbox. So much email, so little time.

I probably could stand to delete more email and unsubscribe from more mailing lists.

Just so you know, I do read and reply to all my personal email.

Subject tags: [] [] [] []